Positional Differences in the Price of WAR

0 Vote(s)Vote

This week, I’ve talked about the retrospective price of WAR on an aggregate level. What I haven’t studied is the retrospective price of WAR by position. I thought this was particularly important in light of my finding that positional adjustments didn’t matter much for arbitration salaries. Players who played tougher defensive positions were underpaid in arbitration, relative to those who played easier defensive positions. As it turns out, the price of WAR has been much more expensive for some positions.

Regard:

Position
N
2007-11 $/WAR
2007 $/WAR
2008 $/WAR
2009 $/WAR
2010 $/WAR
2011 $/WAR

C
116
$4.2
$7….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin